1.2.5 Recording Guidance |
This Chapter should be read in conjunction with Lambeth Values and Principles, Section 4, Recording Values and Principles.
Contents
1. Introduction
| 1.1 | Recording is an essential aspect of providing a social work service, a tool for:
|
| 1.2 | All social workers are responsible for completing social work records in a way which is timely, comprehensive and of good quality and are must therefore follow the policy and guidance set out in this procedure. Managers are responsible for ensuring that their staff adhere to these standards. |
| 1.3 | This policy aims to set out the legal framework, structure, standards and principles governing the compilation and maintenance of case records. All social care staff are expected to be aware of and to follow this policy. |
2. Legal and Regulatory Framework
| 2.1 | Social care records are governed by a complex range of legal requirements, including the common law duty of care; the Human Rights Act 1998 and the Data Protection Act 1998 which repealed the Access to Personal Files Act 1987. |
| 2.2 | The authority is required to implement the Integrated Children’s System (ICS) within an Electronic Social Care Record (ESCR) from January 2007, setting out a mandatory structure for assessment and planning. |
| 2.3 | All registered Social Workers have a responsibility for ‘Maintaining clear and accurate records as required by procedures established at your work’ (Code of Practice 6.2) |
3. The Children’s Social Care Case Record and the Electronic Social Care Record Framework I
| 3.1.1 | The Children’s Social Care Case Record comprises the sum total of all records relating to children who have been referred to or are receiving social care services, including those held on Framework; on other systems (e.g. Outlook and Word, where these have not been uploaded) and on hard copy records. |
| 3.1.2 | A Children’s Social Care Case Record must be maintained whenever there is a request or assessment for, or provision of services to or regarding a child. Policy within Lambeth, in line with the government requirement to implement electronic recording within adult and children’s social care is that the Children’s Social Care Case Record must be maintained as an Electronic Social Care Record (ESCR). |
| 3.1.3 | Consequently, the child’s Framework record must be recognised as the authoritative social care record and must hold all significant information. Separate records can be maintained only where there is a clear business need, authorised by the Head of Service: see Section 6, Use of 'hard copy' Files. |
| 3.1.4 | Managers are responsible for arranging Framework training for all new staff within two weeks of employment. All staff are responsible for developing and maintaining competency in the use of Framework in order to manage their work generally as well as to complete recording. The case record includes: |
| 3.2 | Structured Recording
|
| 3.3 | Unstructured Recording
|
4. Use of the ESCR to maintain the Children’s Social Care Record
| 4.1 | Use of structured documentsAll social work recording must be undertaken directly within Framework and wherever possible a structured document should be used to do this. In particular all planned contacts with looked after children and children who are subject to a child protection plan should be within a structured document. These documents are formatted to ensure that the child’s needs are at the centre of the process and give access to ‘prompts’ and to research data. Structured documents include both ICS documents e.g. Initial Assessment - see Appendix 1 - ICS Documents and internally developed documents e.g. Record of Statutory Visit |
| 4.1.1 | Assessments regarding children in the community, new or updated must be completed using the Initial Assessment; Initial Child Protection Conference Report or Core Assessment format. |
| 4.1.2 | Assessment of looked after children must be completed using the Core Assessment Format -up to the third (10 month) review and thereafter using the Assessment and Progress Record |
| 4.1.3 | Visits to all children who are Looked After or subject to a Child Protection Plan must be recorded using the appropriate Record of Statutory Visit form. |
| 4.1.4 | Structured plans must be drawn up for all children who are Looked After or subject to a Child Protection Plan; or who are receiving an ongoing social work service: the Child/Young Person’s Plan and the Child’s Care Plan must be used as appropriate. |
| 4.1.5 | Where a structured document is in the process of completion i.e. an Initial or Core Assessment, Child Protection or Looked After Child Review or Assessment and Progress Record this is the format that should be used to record information and analysis: the case note should merely refer to the visit or meeting and to any other points that do not readily fit into the structured format. |
| 4.1.6 | The structured ICS documents provide a clear format for assessment and planning and include relevant guidance and reference material. Further guidance is available within the Introduction to ICS Procedure and on the Write Enough website. |
| 4.2 | Issues in RecordingSocial work recording is a skilled process which develops with practice and experience. These notes indicate some of the main issues that arise and which staff should be aware of: |
| 4.2.1 | Clarity and detailIt is important to be aware that records will be accessed by others who do not have the same detailed knowledge as the author of a record. It is important therefore to be clear as to the identity and relationships of those involved. Each person mentioned in a record should be introduced by their full name and relationship to or within the family in question. In some circumstances e.g. assessing whether an injury may have occurred accidentally it is important to be very clear as to room layout, time of day, sequence of events and who was present in the home: time spent recording these details can save a lot of time later. Where concerns or allegations are raised it is essential that the maximum amount of detail is sought, as this can indicate both the seriousness of concern and how credible they are: if parents are alleged to be ‘always shouting’ at a child the informant needs to be asked on what occasions this has occurred recently dates and times; where they were; what was exactly shouted, whether there were other witnesses etc. |
| 4.2.2 | Information source and corroborationWe gather information from a number of sources: our own observation; reports, verbal or written from colleagues, other professionals or members of the public. This may relate to events they themselves have witnessed, to what they have heard from others or judgements they have made. It is essential when recording to be clear as to the source of the information and whether it has been in any way corroborated or cross- checked with others. Where this is not possible it is advisable to qualify that information e.g. Ms Smith informed me that her former partner was involved in drugs; however under the details supplied he does not appear to have a criminal record or to be known to the drugs agencies. It is very common for there to be more than one version of events and essential for recording practice to be aware of this. When making judgements as to the validity of information from different sources factors such as whether the informant was personally involved, and if so whether there is a close emotional involvement e.g. a parent, or whether they are likely to be more neutral and objective; whether there is other data such as hospital records; the length of time since the events in question and the informant’s overall credibility. Where informants provide information regarding their background, as in fostering and adoption assessments it is important to make it clear that this is their account and to note which areas may need to be considered with more circumspection. |
| 4.2.3 | Avoiding judgemental terminologyIt is important to use recording terminology that will be acceptable in all circumstances in which the record may be disclosed, including complaints enquiries, court hearings and access to records requests. Neutral and professional terminology also helps us to distance our own emotional reaction. Therefore instead of: ‘The flat was absolutely filthy and Mrs Smith reeked of drink’. ‘I saw evidence of waste food and soiled nappies on the floor throughout the living area. When I spoke to Mrs Smith there was a noticeable smell of alcohol on her breath’ |
| 4.2.4 | Using analysisAn essential aspect of recording is the evaluation of the different types of information provided to make a judgement as to the issues at hand and the future action which should be taken. This involves: Assembling the information: ‘A referral from Sunnyside Nursery regarding the Smith children indicated that their attendance had become irregular over the past month (Objective data from Nursery Register) On the occasions they have attended it was reported that they were hungry and had not been bathed recently (Credible account from qualified professionals). When I visited I saw evidence of waste food and soiled nappies throughout the living area and a smell of alcohol on Mrs Smith’s breath (Worker’s first hand observations) Mrs Smith explained to me that she hadn’t been able to keep up with the housework as she has been visiting her mother in Mayday Hospital and she had a GP appointment about her knee pain. When I asked her if she had been drinking she said she had had two or three glasses of wine with a friend the night before. (Implausible explanations) Arriving at a conclusion and analysis On the basis of the information received and my assessment visit I would conclude that there has been a significant deterioration in Mrs Smith’s parental capacity to meet her children’s basic needs and that this is likely to be due to alcohol abuse, which she is not currently acknowledging. Due to the likelihood that this is a long-term situation likely to cause damage to the children due to neglect I recommend that an Initial Child Protection Conference be called to consider the need for a formal child protection plan |
| 4.2.5 | Recording with sibling groupsA principle underlying both the Data Protection Act and the Integrated Children’s System is that a separate case record is maintained for each service user. This has the advantages of maintaining a separation of individual data in the event of a request for access and of encouraging a focus on the child’s individual needs. However; a consequence of this is that there can be a need for duplication of recording when there are a number of children with closely related difficulties. In order to manage this dilemma the following considerations apply: An Initial Assessment should normally be undertaken of the needs of all children living in the household of a child who is referred for service if it can reasonably be supposed that the concerns expressed in the referral might apply to those children. This would include all referrals where there are concerns regarding the standard of parental care or other severe stress within the family; however, where there is a specific issue such as a disability applying to one child it may not be necessary to assess siblings where there are no evident problems or concerns. Assessment should recommend, and a management decision confirm which of the children within a family are receiving or need to receive a service. Where children are looked after or require a protection plan this will be clear. It may not be necessary to maintain a case record on all children in the family where there is no need for a direct service though the personal details of all children should be linked, and a further Initial Assessment undertaken if the need arises. The dimension of the ICS Initial and Core Assessment relating to the child’s developmental needs must always be completed on an individual basis. It is permissible to copy the dimensions relating to parental capacity and family and environmental factors between siblings, though these should always be reviewed in the light of individual circumstances e.g. where there may be different fathers. |
5. Use of Case Notes
6. Use of ‘hard copy’ Files
| 6.1 | Children’s Social Care has moved from the use of hard copy files to the electronic record it is recognised that this represents a cultural shift and it is important that practice adjusts away from the concept of the hard file as the ‘real’ case record the ESCR is now the primary means of recording our work. |
| 6.2 | Hard copy records can be maintained where it is necessary to have certain key documents in a portable and easily referenced form e.g. court hearings. However, this must be a copy of the Framework record and not separate or different. |
| 6.3 | Hard copies can be maintained separately only:
|
7. Security of Case Records
8. Sharing Information
| 8.1 | Information regarding children and families must be shared as necessary with partner agencies responsible for provision of services and staff should facilitate this in an efficient and expeditious manner. When there are urgent safeguarding issues at stake we may judge that the child’s immediate safety outweighs other considerations, however these are relatively rare and the following normally apply: |
| 8.2 | Checking the identity of the contact: particularly where there is a telephone contact from another Local Authority it is advisable to ring back through the switchboard to confirm the identity of the caller. Similarly, before sending information in an e mail the address should be checked by requesting confirmation of receipt of a blank e mail. |
| 8.3 | Requests for disclosure of documents should be put in writing, setting out the reason for which the information is required. |
| 8.4 | The service user including parents where appropriate - should be informed of and give consent to the disclosure of information to other agencies. ‘Working Together’ provides for exemption to this only where the act of seeking consent would be likely to cause risk to the child. |
| 8.5 | The amount and depth of information shared should be commensurate with the issue where a former service user has become looked after by another authority it will probably be appropriate to share everything: where the request is in respect of a child’s special needs it may not be appropriate to share confidential information regarding other family members. |
9. Adoption Records
| 9.1 | Adoption records are exempt from disclosure under the DPA. For information regarding natural parents’ and adoptees’ access to records please refer to Access to Birth/Adoption Case Records Procedure. |
10. Lambeth Children and Young People’s Service - Case Recording Standards
These standards are based on the standards recommended in the Social Services Inspectorate Report ‘Recording with Care’.
| 1. | Case recording is part of the service provided to users and carersThis means that we must use an open and collaborative approach in which users:
|
| 2. | The quality and content of case records reflects good professional practice and internal guidance Records must:
|
| 3. | Principles and Purposes of Case RecordingPurposes, principles and legal requirements are clearly set out.
|
| 4. | Contributions to case records and sharing information: the service has guidance on and systems for receiving contributions to case records from external sources and for the appropriate sharing of information from them.
|
| 5. | Equalities in recording practices: the service requires that service and corporate equalities policies are reflected in the case record.
|
| 6. | Management Arrangements: management arrangements ensure the practice of case recording meets accepted professional standards and the service’s policy and procedural requirements.
|
Appendix 1 ICS Documents
Integrated Children’s System Documents Summary of Requirements
| ICS Documents summary of requirements | |
| Document type | Requirement |
| Initial Assessment | Within 7 working days of referral |
| Core Assessment | New: Within 35 working days of the end of the preceding Initial Assessment. On all children where there have been S47 enquiries whether or not further action is being taken. On all looked after children where there is no current Core Assessment. Update: With all children actively being worked with where there is a significant change in circumstances, or where the child moves up an age band |
| Initial CP Conference Report | Within 15 days of the decision to hold a conference |
| Review CP Conference Report | For each subsequent conference links to the CCYP Plan - Protection |
| Child/Young Person’s Plan (Protection) | For all children where a Protection Plan is needed. To be developed from the Initial Child Protection Plan by the Key Worker and Core Group.
Should be updated as necessary following each conference. |
| Child/Young Person’s Plan (CiN) | For all children receiving an ongoing service who are neither looked after nor are in need of protection. Can be used to cover children receiving regular respite care. |
| Looked After Child Review Part 1 | Prior to all LAC reviews 28 days, 3 months and then at 6 monthly intervals Links with child’s care plan |
| Child’s Care Plan parts 1&2 | For all Looked After Children from first review onwards Should be updated following each review. |
| Child’s Adoption Plan | Runs alongside Care Plan for all children where adoption is being considered. Replaces Part 1 of the Child’s Care Plan where adoption is the firm plan. |
| Assessment and Progress Record | Required on all children who remain looked after at their third (10 month) review, or as soon as it is clear that they are unlikely to be making a prompt return to parents . should be updated when a child moves up an age band. |
| Pathway Plan | Required on all looked after children from age 16 |
End





